Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jonathan Hayward's avatar

I both disagree and agree with the above opinion. My own relationship with television started to become strained as the last century ended and the new one began. I was fortunate enough to grow up as a young boy in the 1970s, which has generally been regarded as the true classic era of British television, maturing from its embryonic years of the 50s, the optimism and meritocracy of the swinging 60s, leading on to the expansion to four national TV channels of the 80s, plus Breakfast TV, of course.

The 70s itself, though, was hardly a era that could be termed positive. Pessimism was its forte, plagued by domestic and international political and social crises, as has been the dismal byword in the 2020's. The British film industry virtually collapsed on this decade, as American film studios closed their UK operations,taking millions in financial backing with them.This was an unexpected boost for British TV, as all the top actors,directors and writers turned their attention to the small rather than the big screen ,obvious in the number of classic dramas, documentaries and comedies that are still cherished and discussed to the present day, the ratio of quality TV much higher then than it is now.

But there is a catch; there was far less TV in the 70s with just three major channels, BBCs 1 and 2, and regional ITV channels like Granada (which was my area). There was no 24 hour broadcasting, BBC1 often had closedown intervals with the famous test card and accompanied music for several hours during routine weekday programming, and aside from s7ch anomalies as Open University programmes and coverage of sports events (usually Test Cricket), BBC2's normal schedules began in the mid-evening around 7pm, which were lucky to go on five hours before closedown around midnight, about the same time BBC1 and ITV would lock up for the night. In the mid-70s, there was even less programming and earlier closedowns due to said crises as described above, like the oil shock, power cuts and three-day week to save and preserve precarious energy supplies. So yes, my views on this era of broadcasting are tinged with relentless bias and dreamy childhood nostalgia, but clearly it was not a permanent bed of roses. And despite the peerless classics we still love, there was an awful lot of "wallpaper" TV, flops, clunkers, embarrassments and fiascos that were quintessential examples of ephemeral TV, made for its time and place but with virtually no historical or cultural value barely a few months after broadcast never mind many decades later. Such clips turn up all the time on YouTube now and can often be discussed and broke down on various blogs, podcasts and seperate YouTube channels themselves in witty, informative and pithy terms, including Curious British Telly itself!

It was warned in the 70s that TV would expand into the multi-channel universe that indeed it has now become.So why is it that a grumpy non-millenial as myself no longer bothers with TV, not having said TV licence now for over a decade? I suppose I was always set in my ways, thinking 4 or maybe 5 national TV channels was more than enough, as the amount of good or quality TV was easier to notice and appreciate over average, mediocre or genuinely bad TV.With just 2-3 national TV channels in the first three decades of its major broadcasting history ( the 1940s to the 1970s), it was a fairly straightforward task to pick out the proverbial wheat from the chaff. But relentless expansion of broadcasting since the 1980s has not necessarily led to more choice. Most channels and programming are exhaustingly similar to each other, whether it be specialised in lifestyle, sports, drama, comedy, drama, religion, films, news, current affairs and indeed nostalgia/classic TV. Ideas and talent can only be spread so far; perhaps 4 national TV channels, or maybe even 3, was just about enough, but thousands of channels available on free view or subscription means that separating wheat from chaff is now a pointless,interminable, if not highly expensive task from my own point of view. I dread any possibility of wading through thousands of TV channels that could take hours before a high quality show or series turns up, as I'd be too tired to watch after such tedious searching. Perhaps there are more quality shows now with endlessly more TV stations available, but what is also undeniable is that there's far more broadcasting mediocrity and dross too, most of it going on 24 hours a day. TV has evolved as any other practicality or humanity itself, but such evolution for this particular medium has been to its detriment, not advantage.

John Read's avatar

Anyone who thinks that there isn’t any great British TV being made now isn’t looking in the right places. Your examples are spot on, and to this I would add Mum , Harlots , Small Prophets , Don’t Forget the Driver and many more. There is still a lot of bad British TV too, but there always was. We just remember the best, and the best of British TV in the previous decades was great too but some TV was very bad.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?